Legal Opinion
Vasapolli v. Rostoff
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 31, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-11501-KPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
KEETON, District Judge.
In this civil action, plaintiffs assert claims based on an alleged scheme to induce plaintiffs to purchase condominium units through fraud and coercive conduct at closings. The Bank for Savings is alleged to be a participant in the scheme. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver for The Bank for Savings (“BFS”), moves for summary judgment.
Now before the court are: (1) FDIC’s motion for summary judgment with supporting memorandum and affidavit (Docket Nos. 4-6, filed January 22, 1992); (2) plaintiffs’ statement of facts,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Beulah Smith, Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Richard ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Steven Wynne v. Tufts University School of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Bessie A. Kauffman v. Puerto Rico Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vasapolli v. RostoffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Brown v. ArmstrongDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Grossman v. Durham Commercial Capital Corp. (In re Ablitt)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Kennedy v. Osmanski, IIIDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
- Optim LLC v. Freeman Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025