Legal Opinion
Vasapolli v. Rostoff
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 8, 1994No. 94-1319PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
It is trite, but true, that not every wrong has a remedy — much less a remedy wholly satisfactory to the purported victims. This litigation illustrates the point in the context of an appeal matching the plaintiffs, a group of borrowers who complain that they were swindled, against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), in its capacity as liquidating agent for the now defunct Bank for Savings (the Bank). Specifically, plain tiffs challenge district court orders granting summary judgment against them in respect to (1) claims that they originally brought against…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. World University Inc., Santa Barbara Center CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Plat 20, Lot 17Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Wilfredo Martinez, A/K/A Wilfredo Martinez Rodriguez v. Rafael Colon, A/K/A Rafael Colon PizarroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Aybar v. Crispin-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Perez-De-Munoz v. Volvo Car Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- McIntosh v. AntoninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.