Legal Opinion

Dwight R. Woodford Co. v. Johnson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 3, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of contract upon an account annexed for insurance premiums, alleged by the plaintiff to have been paid on behalf of the defendant. The answer is a general denial, payment, and the further answer that the defendant “never entered into a contract with the plaintiff for any insurance; that if he entered into any contract for insurance, as alleged, it was with one Richard Buntin for a definite period of time which elapsed prior to the dates charged in the declaration.” At the close of all the evidence the defendant moved in writing that a verdict be directed in his favor; the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boston Ice Co. v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Buffington v. McNallyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Lunn & Sweet Co. v. WolfmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Borrowscale v. BosworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spence, Bryson, Inc. v. China Products Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Weiss v. Ron Currier's Hilltop Chevrolet, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Lefebvre v. Town of PembrokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API