Spence, Bryson, Inc. v. China Products Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
The parties submitted to arbitration. The arbitrators made an award in favor of the plaintiff, and at the hearing before a judge of the Superior Court, who found for the plaintiff, the defendant excepted to the denial of certain requests for rulings, and also to the allowance of the plaintiff's motion to substitute the original award for the copy that had previously been filed with the clerk of the Superior Court. See Franks v. Franks, 294 Mass. 262, 268, and cases cited.
The bill of exceptions states unqualifiedly that the amount of the award of the arbitrators “represented the damages to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Home Savings Bank v. SavranskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Boston & Albany Railroad v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Lakube v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Franks v. FranksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Dwight R. Woodford Co. v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Saint Luke's Hospital v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Sanford v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Town of Milton v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Maxwell Shapiro Woolen Co. Inc. v. Amerotron Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Foster v. Mayor of BeverlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.