Legal Opinion
Lodi Truck Service, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1983No. 82-7308PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, Senior District Judge:
Lodi Truck Service, Inc. and four other carriers (Lodi) seek to set aside a decision of the Interstate Commerce Commission granting Walt Wilson Trucking, Inc. (Wilson) authority to transport general commodities (with specific exemptions) (1) between ocean ports in California, Oregon, and Washington, and (2) between the ocean ports and inland locations in the same states. We affirm the decision of the Commission.
Wilson, supported by nine shippers, applied for authority to transport general commodities from, to, and between points in California, Oregon, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- O-J Transport Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, and Associated Truck Lines, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Crete Carrier Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Containerfreight Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Steven Lockert v. United States Department of Labor, Ann McLaughlin Secretary of Labor, and Pullman Power Products Corporation, Respondent-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- California Trucking Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- DHX, INC. v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Gray Lines Tour, Company Of Southern Nevada v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Containerfreight Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.