Legal Opinion
Crete Carrier Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 1, 1978No. 77-1765PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
Crete Carrier Corporation (Crete Carrier) has petitioned this court to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission. The order in question affirmed an order of the Commission’s Review Board Number 3 granting common carrier operating authority to Smithway Motor Xpress, Inc. (Smithway). We deny Crete Carrier’s petition.
I
On February 16, 1976, Smith way filed an application for a motor carrier certificate or permit, to operate as a common carrier by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, in the transportation of iron and steel articles, between plantsites and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Armored Carrier Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Armored Carrier Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966
- Slay Transportation Co., Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1973
- National Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Curtis, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, and Story, Inc., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Frank J. Laird v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, the Kansas City Southern Railway Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Lodi Truck Service, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- The Coalition For Fair And Equitable Regulation Of Docks On Lake Of The Ozarks v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Amador Stage Lines, Inc. v. The United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, and Quality Coach Lines, Inc., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.