Legal Opinion
DHX, INC. v. Surface Transportation Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 30, 2007No. 05-74592PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
DHX, Inc., a freight forwarder, petitions for review of a decision by the Surface Transportation Board (“STB”) denying its complaint challenging the reasonableness of certain rates and practices of Matson Navigation Co., Inc. (“Matson”), and Sea-Land Service, Inc., now Horizon Lines, LLC (“Horizon”), two water carriers operating in the noncontiguous domestic trade between Hawaii and ports in the continental United States. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2321 and 2342(5), and we deny the petition for review.
I. A
The STB is a successor to the Interstate…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, LLPSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Northern Plains Resource Council, Inc. v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Ass'n of American Railroads v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- B & S Holdings, LLC v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2012
- Oregon Coast Scenic Railroad v. Oregon Department of State LandsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty. v. Bnsf Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.