Legal Opinion

SHAW INVESTMENT CO. v. Rollert

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1987No. Docket 88792PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCynar, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition on the ground that the statute of limitations barred plaintiff’s legal malpractice action. We reverse.

Plaintiff is a Michigan corporation. Defendant E. David Rollert is a practicing attorney in the State of Michigan and a partner in the law firm of Menmuir, Zimmerman, Rollert and Kuhn. Prior to October, 1979, Rollert had acted as legal counsel for plaintiff for a number of years. In October, 1979, while still acting as attorney for plaintiff, Rollert persuaded Robert Shaw, one of plaintiff’s three…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sam v. BalardoMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Luick v. RademacherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Biberstine v. WoodworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Waldorf v. ZinbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Wright v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. St John HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Maureen Fitzgerald v. Donald E OehmkeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Soaring Pine Capital Real Estate v. Park Street Group RealtyMichigan Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API