Philbrook v. Howard
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, Acting P. J.
This is a suit for rescission of a conveyance of real property brought in plaintiff’s behalf by his legally appointed guardian. The complaint alleges three causes of action as grounds for rescission: (1) that when plaintiff executed the conveyance he was of unsound mind to such an extent as to be incapable of transacting business; (2) that the consideration for the conveyance was grossly inadequate; and (3) that the conveyance was the result of defendant’s exercise of undue influence over plaintiff. De fendant’s answer consisted of a general denial and the affirmative defenses of laches and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Stewart v. MarvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Shaffer v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Stratton v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Estate of BrastCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smalley v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Walton v. Bank of California, National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Peterson v. EllebrechtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Knott v. PervereDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1968