Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.
At the time of a fire which destroyed its-cotton gin and cottonseed warehouse and contents, McCoy Gin Company, Inc., was-insured against its own loss by six certain fire insurance policies. It has been compensated for such' loss by the insurers. However, in this fire there was also destroyed a quantity of cottonseed which had been bought by, and was in the custody of,, the gin company on behalf of the Commodity Credit Corporation under a contract which such Corporation had proposed and made in carrying out the cottonseed price support program of 1949. The United States…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Home Insurance v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- California Insurance v. Union Compress Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- B. N. Exton & Co. v. Home Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Johnston v. Charles Abresch Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. v. GayleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- American Empire Insurance Company of South Dakota v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Republic National Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SlifkinDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1961
- Highlands Insurance Co. v. City of Galveston Ex Rel. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Hudiburg Chevrolet, Inc. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.