Legal Opinion
Ecolochem, Inc. v. Southern California Edison Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 7, 2000No. 99-1043PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Ecolochem, Inc. (“Ecolochem”) filed suit in 1992, alleging that Southern California Edison Company (“Edison”) infringed Ec-olochem’s U.S. Patent Nos. 4,556,492 (“the ’492 patent”) and 4,818,411 (“the ’411 patent”) when deoxygenating water in the High-Flow Makeup Demineralizer (“HFMUD”) at Edison’s San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (“SONGS”). Edison denied infringement, counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of invalidity, and asserted equitable defenses. By grant of partial summary judgment to Edison, the United States District Court for the Central District of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wms Gaming Inc. v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist and Derrick Company, Harris Press and Shear Division, Commercial Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. And Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Doing Business as Labcorp)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Wbip, LLC v. Kohler Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Net MoneyIN, Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.