Legal Opinion

Barnette v. Robertson

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 30, 2009No. 2070689Published

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Judge.

On July 5, 2005, Henry Robertson (“the buyer”) purchased a used manufactured home from Darryhl Chad Barnette d/b/a Warrior Wholesale Homes (“the seller”). The purchase contract provided that the home was sold “ ‘as is’- — -with no warranty.” In a handwritten section of the contract, the seller, however, added the following:

“Utility connections are [the buyer’s] responsibility. [The seller] will fix the 4 holes in the siding (3-front, 1-back). [The seller] will repair the faucets in home (knobs were missing), paint the vents on top of the home, clean the home before delivery,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Medical Health Systems, Inc. v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Ex Parte CleghornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Kirksey v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Dovel v. National Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Meador v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API