Meador v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs Richard Meador and Kimberly Meador appeal: (1) a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the defendant Cincinnati Insurance Company ("Cincinnati"); and (2) the denial of the plaintiffs' postjudgment motion for a new trial. We reverse and remand.
In April 2003, the plaintiffs sued Cincinnati for breach of contract.1 The plaintiffs alleged that they had sustained a theft loss on May 20, 2002, when they were insured against such a loss by a policy of renter's insurance issued to them by Cincinnati ("the policy"); that they had given Cincinnati timely notice of their theft…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Bechtel v. Crown Cent. Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Patterson v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Associated Doctors Health & Life Insurance v. HanksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barnette v. RobertsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Lang v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2023