Legal Opinion
United States v. Hoey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 22, 2002No. 01-30029. D.C. No. CR-99-00068-JKSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Jeffrey Brian Hoey appeals his 60-month sentence imposed following his jury trial conviction for conspiracy to manufacture marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. Reviewing de novo, United States v. Arellano-Rivera, 244 F.3d 1119, 1127 (9th Cir.2001), we affirm.
Hoey contends that because the jury did not determine the issue of marijuana quantity, the district court erred by sentencing him under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(D), instead of § 841(b)(4). Hoey’s otherwise judicially estopped contention…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Patricia Hart v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Kayle NordbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Hector Arellano-Rivera,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- SER Gabrielle M. v. Hon. David R. Janes, JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016