Legal Opinion
United States v. Calvin Wayne Buckland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 7, 2002No. 99-30285PublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TROTT; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge HUG; Dissent by Judge TASHIMA.
OPINION
TROTT, Circuit Judge,
with whom SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, O’SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, GOULD, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, join. Circuit Judge T.G. NELSON joins except for Part IV B:
On June 26, 2000, the Supreme Court held in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), that “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- United States v. Larry D. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Edward CarranzaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Juan Sanchez-Cervantes, AKA Hugo Quirox, Quiroc, Quiroz, Quiroz Trejo, and Quiroz TapiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Christina Maria Mendoza-PazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.