Legal Opinion

Laurenti v. Laurenti

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 2007No. B186946PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, Acting P. J.

Michelle Laurenti appeals from an order requiring her to pay all fees billed by a court-appointed evaluator who was disqualified *397from further service in this family law matter on Michelle’s1 successful motion. Michelle contends the evaluator should receive no compensation because he violated court rules by making improper ex parte communications, and he was removed from the matter by the court before he completed his evaluation and made a recommendation. Michelle also contends the trial court erred in failing to determine a reasonable fee for the evaluator’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Reveron v. SeagondollarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams v. Jack A.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Benner v. Tam (In re Benner), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Marriage of BennerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API