Legal Opinion

Jones v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 2004No. D042335PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NARES, Acting P. J.

This case involves interpretation of the criminal discovery chapter (Pen. Code, 1 § 1054 et seq., hereafter occasionally referred to as the Criminal Discovery Statute) implemented in 1990 as part of Proposition 115. The question of first impression we must decide in this writ proceeding is whether the reciprocal discovery provisions of the Criminal Discovery Statute apply to a probation revocation hearing such that a probationer is obligated to provide discovery to the prosecution in such a proceeding. 2 We hold that the reciprocal discovery provisions set forth in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Gray v. NetherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Magallan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. People v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. County of Placer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Geadau v. EvansDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
  5. People v. Cortez CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API