Legal Opinion
Geadau v. Evans
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 21, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00335Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAUL GEADAU, Case No. 25-cv-0335-MMA-JLB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 14 NATHAN B. EVANS, et al., 15 Defendants. [Doc. No. 5] 16 17 18 19 20 21 Defendants Nathan B. Evans, Michael Hindi, and Big Fish Studios, LLC 22 (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Raul Geadau’s 23 (“Plaintiff”) complaint on March 13, 2025. Doc. No. 5. Plaintiff filed a response in 24 opposition, to which Defendants replied. Doc. Nos. 6, 8. On…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.