United States v. Rockwell International Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
In 1992, Rockwell International Corporation entered into a plea agreement with the United States (the “government”), pleading guilty to various environmental crimes and agreeing to pay a fine of $18.5 million. In return, the government promised to refrain from further criminal and, to a lesser extent, civil proceedings. Rockwell appeals the district court’s refusal to entertain its interpretation of that plea agreement, an interpretation that would forbid the government from intervening in a qui tam action against Rockwell. We conclude that the district court was correct…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Linda K. Moothart v. A. Gary Bell, Bradley P. Pollock, Bell & Pollock, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. BunnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Frederick BryeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States ex rel. Stone v. Rockwell International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.