Legal Opinion

Denver Industrial Corp. v. Kesselring

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 23, 1932No. 12,413PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Adams

Denver Industrial Corporation, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, sued the defendants August Kesselring- and Katherine Kesselring- upon their promissory note. The instrument was on the form known as a “ cognovit, ’ ’ or “judgment note,” containing a warrant of attorney to enter the makers’ appearance and confess judgment. Pursuant thereto, plaintiff took judgment without service of process. Thereafter, the defendants appeared, filed an affidavit of a meritorious defense and had the judgment set aside. Leave was granted to defendants to plead, and they filed an answer and counterclaim. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gertner v. Limon National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Mulford v. Torrey Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  3. Creek v. Lebo Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. Wheelock v. HondiusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  5. Axelson v. Dailey Co-Operative Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lucero v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  2. Prather v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  3. Kean v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Phoenix Funding, LLC v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLCNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Rencher v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API