Legal Opinion

Wheelock v. Hondius

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 7, 1924No. 10,572PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

This action is by Hondius payee, against Wheelock maker, of a promissory note. The answer admits that defendant and his son Frank signed this note, but denies that there was any consideration for it, and denies that it was delivered by the defendant to the plaintiff. The second and affirmative defense purports to set up a conditional delivery, which the plaintiff denominates an attempt by oral testimony, to contradict and vary the terms of the written note. The plaintiff’s general demurrer to the affirmative defense was overruled, and upon a trial before a jury and at the close of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mulford v. Torrey Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  2. Faris v. BeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Welles v. Colorado National Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  4. McFarland v. HuenersOregon Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Central Bank of Bingham v. PerkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Hicks v. CramerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. Rock River Investment Co. v. Mountain Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  4. Denver Industrial Corp. v. KesselringSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  5. Brownell v. HeitmanOregon Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API