Legal Opinion

Lucero v. Smith

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 7, 1942No. 15,021PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

In an action against plaintiff in error on a cognovit note, instituted July 29, 1940, an attorney at law, not otherwise representing him, proceeding pursuant to the provisions of the note, seemingly ample to that end, appeared in the action the same day, waived issuance and service of process, and confessed judgment in favor of defendant in error in the sum of $632.50, $550 being the claimed balance thereon, to which was added $82.50 as an attorney fee, computed as provided in the note. The court immediately entered judgment in the sum of the confession, and ordered that execution issue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richards v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  2. Denver Industrial Corp. v. KesselringSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  3. Philbrick v. Conejos County State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coon v. District Court in and for County of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  2. Prather v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  3. Kean v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Rencher v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  5. Rencher v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API