Legal Opinion

Brooks v. American Lumber & Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 1925No. 24,407PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Appeal from a judgment reforming an instrument, purporting to be a satisfaction of a real estate mortgage, on the ground of mutual mistake, and foreclosing the mortgage therein mentioned.

The defendant, American Lumber & Construction Company, was the owner of 19 parcels of real estate, situated in St. Louis county, this state, subject to five mortgages — one for $4,000 covering five lots, and four of $1,500 each upon six other of such lots. In March, 1919, the owner executed, to the plaintiff, its five promissory notes for $3,000 each, and, at the same time, executed a mortgage upon all of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carey v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Martin v. Commercial Nat. Bank of MacOnSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Holt v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Shraiberg v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. StagebergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Watson v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Southern Dairies, Inc. v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  3. In re SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API