Novak Unemployment Compensation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Woodside, J.,
This is an appeal from the decision of the Unemployment, Compensation Board of Review denying the appellant unemployment compensation on the ground that she was disqualified under the provisions of §402(b) *51of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 P.S. §802(b).
This part of the law provides: “An employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week— ... (b)(1) In which his unemployment is due to voluntarily leaving work without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature ...”
The claimant was pregnant. During the time in question, the law provided that she was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- District of Columbia's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Brilhart Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Tronieri Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Lavely v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Herko Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Heriger Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Perun v. F. W. Woolworth Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1972