Legal Opinion
Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Board
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided April 7, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANTRELL, Judge.
The Tennessee Valley Authority, joined by the Upper Duck River Development Agency, Marshall and Maury Counties, and the cities of Columbia and Lewisburg, petitioned the Tennessee Water Quality Control Board for certification under Section 401 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and a permit under Section 7 of the Tennessee Water Quality Control Act, allowing TV A to complete the Columbia Dam and impound the waters of the Duck River. A divided board granted the certificate and permit despite opposition from the appellants, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc.,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Humana of Tennessee v. Tennessee Health Facilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Yongyouth Ruangswang and Vanapar Ruangswang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Costello v. Acco Transport Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jackson Express, Inc. v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Exxon Corp. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Vodafone Americas Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Commissioner of Revenue, State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- Clear Channel Outdoors v. Tennessee Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
- Richard Feldman v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.