Legal Opinion
Exxon Corp. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 2002No. M2000-00614-SC-R11-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J.,
delivered the opinion of the court,
in which E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., JANICE M. HOLDER, and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined.
We granted permission to appeal in this case to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in defining the phrase “on that same location” as it is used in Tenn. Code Ann. § 57-5-109 to mean anywhere within the boundary lines of the property. We hold that such a definition, when considered in pari materia with the Nashville and Davidson County Metropolitan Code, broadens the scope of this statutory grandfather provision.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gleaves v. Checker Cab Transit Corp., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Serv-U-Mart, Inc. v. Sullivan CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Teague v. Campbell CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Lamar Advertising of Tennessee, Inc. v. City of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Watkins v. NaifehTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lebovitz v. Hagemeyer (In Re Lebovitz)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Jacks v. City of Millington Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
- Miller v. Civil Service Commission of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
- Exxonmobil Oil Corp. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Yokley v. State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.