Legal Opinion

Darlington, Inc. v. Federal Housing Administration

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided September 22, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 4741PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff is the owner of an apartment house at Charleston, S. C., covered by a mortgage which has been insured by the Federal Housing Administration pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Housing Act of 1934, 12 U.S.C.A. § 1703. The apartment house was erected and the mortgage thereon executed by plaintiff and insured by the Federal Housing Administration prior to the passage of the Federal Housing Act of 1954, 68 Stat. 590, and nothing in any of the contracts relating to the construction of. the apartment house, the execution of the mortgage thereon or the insuring of the same by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stefanelli v. MinardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Watson v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Ex Parte CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Stainback v. Mo Hock Ke Lok PoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Krebs v. AshbrookDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
  2. Darlington, Inc. v. Federal Housing AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1957
  3. United States of America v. H. R. LemayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Krebs v. AshbrookDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API