Legal Opinion
Herbst v. Riverside Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 13, 2013No. 26493PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Herbst v. Riverside Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.,
2013-Ohio-916.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) MICHAEL HERBST, et al. C.A. No. 26493 Appellants v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY URBAN COURT OF COMMON PLEAS REDEVELOPMENT CORP. COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO CASE No. CV 2011-07-4052 Appellee DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: March 13, 2013 MOORE, Presiding Judge. {¶1} Plaintiff-Appellants, Michael and Kimberly Herbst (collectively “the Herbsts”), appeal from the judgment of the Summit County Court of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
- Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baker v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Honabarger v. Wayne Sav. Community BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Jacboson v. MOM Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018