Legal Opinion

Ritenour v. Mathews

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1873PublishedCited by 29 opinions

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

This case has been twice before in this court; 31 Ind. 31, and 34 Ind. 279. The action was predicated upon two promissory notes held by the appellant against the appellee. Upon the return of the cause to the common pleas the last time, there was a trial by jury upon the same issues that had been previously formed, a verdict for the defendant, motion by the plaintiff for judgment non obstante veredicto overruled; motion for a new trial by the plaintiff also overruled; motion by the same party in arrest of judgment overruled, and final judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff duly excepted to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. NugentIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Ford v. GarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Mathews v. RitenourIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Cameron v. WarbrittonIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Peelman v. PeelmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1853

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lincoln Operating Co. v. GillisIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Abbott v. DoaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  3. Maxwell v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Binford v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. McGuffin v. Coyle and GussSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API