Legal Opinion

In Re Raymond Clay and Scott Clay, D/B/A the Emporium

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1994No. 94-50507PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

Raymond and Scott Clay want a jury trial, but not in bankruptcy court. The Clays seek a writ of mandamus to prevent the bankruptcy court from conducting a jury trial in various core proceedings. The argument is that Congress cannot constitutionally empower non-Article III bankruptcy judges to hold jury trials without the parties’ consent. Because the applicable statute may fairly be read as not granting such authority, we say only that such a congressional effort would be dubious at best.

The trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Heeleo Corporation filed a…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. EstelleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. DeesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. Fairchild Aircraft Inc. v. Cambell (In Re Fairchild Aircraft Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1995
  4. Mirant Corp. v. the Southern Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
  5. McFarland v. Leyh (In re Texas General Petroleum Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API