In Re Raymond Clay and Scott Clay, D/B/A the Emporium
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
Raymond and Scott Clay want a jury trial, but not in bankruptcy court. The Clays seek a writ of mandamus to prevent the bankruptcy court from conducting a jury trial in various core proceedings. The argument is that Congress cannot constitutionally empower non-Article III bankruptcy judges to hold jury trials without the parties’ consent. Because the applicable statute may fairly be read as not granting such authority, we say only that such a congressional effort would be dubious at best.
The trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Heeleo Corporation filed a…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Ruiz v. EstelleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. DeesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Fairchild Aircraft Inc. v. Cambell (In Re Fairchild Aircraft Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1995
- Mirant Corp. v. the Southern Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- McFarland v. Leyh (In re Texas General Petroleum Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.