Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. Estelle

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 20, 1998No. 97-21003PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:

This ease involves the attempt by appellants, two Texas state legislators, to intervene in the long pending suit concerning Texas prison conditions, which began more than twenty-five years ago. The district court denied appellants’ motion to intervene under Fed.R.Civ.P., Rules 24(a)(1), 24(a)(2), and 24(b)(2). 1 Because we conclude that 18 U.S.C. § 3626(a)(3)(F) grants the appellants “an unconditional right to intervene” in this case within the meaning of Rule 24(a)(1), we reverse.

In 1972, class-action plaintiffs David Ruiz, et. al. (plaintiffs), initiated litigation…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Mangual v. Rotger-SabatCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Ruth Bauer v. The State of Texas, the Presiding Judge of Probate Court Number 3 of Harris County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Bond v. UtrerasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Goldin v. BartholowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  5. Kitty Hawk Aircargo, Inc. v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API