Legal Opinion

United States v. Dees

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1997No. 96-50956PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

Janet Dees pled guilty to a bank fraud charge and now appeals her sentence. By our own motion, we raise but ultimately reject a jurisdictional challenge to Dees’s conviction based on the fact that a magistrate judge conducted her plea proceeding. We dismiss Dees’s appeal on the issue that she does press, a miscalculation of her sentence, because Dees in her plea agreement waived her right to an appeal.

I

Dees participated in a scheme to fraudulently obtain bank loans for the financing of mobile-home sales. The government filed a single count information…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. BentonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  3. Freeman v. County of BexarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Jack BeardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. BaymonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API