Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Conseco, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided December 30, 2002No. 3:02-cv-01073PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BARBOUR, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on the following Motions:

1) Motion of Plaintiffs to Remand;

2) Motion of Plaintiffs to Strike Additional Arguments and Exhibits; and

3) Motion of Plaintiffs to Strike Amended Notice of Removal.

Having considered the Motions, Responses Rebuttals, and attachments to each, as well as supporting and opposing authority, the Court finds that:

1) the Motion of Plaintiffs to Remand is not well taken and should be denied;

2) the Motion of Plaintiffs to Strike Additional Arguments and Exhibits is not well taken and should be denied; and

3…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Adrian Cavallini v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Prempro Products Liability Litigation v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. In Re Silica Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
  3. Jamison v. Purdue Pharma Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2003
  4. Osborn v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004
  5. Grennell v. Western Southern Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API