Tagg v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TROUT, Justice.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Industrial Commission which held that a claimant who entered a lump sum settlement agreement with his employer/surety *96was not barred from later seeking benefits from the Industrial Special Indemnity Fund. We affirm the decision of the Industrial Commission.
I
BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
Claimant-respondent Lloyd Tagg (Tagg) was injured on the job in December of 1985. He timely filed a claim for worker’s compensation benefits against his employer with the Industrial Commission (Commission). On July 15, 1987, Tagg, his employer, and his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Woodvine v. Triangle Dairy, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Sines v. AppelIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Horton v. Garrett Freightlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Royce v. Southwest Pipe of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Mapusaga v. Red Lion Riverside InnIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burton v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Stanley v. Idaho Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
- Westman v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2025