Legal Opinion

Tagg v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1993No. 19284PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Industrial Commission which held that a claimant who entered a lump sum settlement agreement with his employer/surety *96was not barred from later seeking benefits from the Industrial Special Indemnity Fund. We affirm the decision of the Industrial Commission.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Claimant-respondent Lloyd Tagg (Tagg) was injured on the job in December of 1985. He timely filed a claim for worker’s compensation benefits against his employer with the Industrial Commission (Commission). On July 15, 1987, Tagg, his employer, and his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woodvine v. Triangle Dairy, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Sines v. AppelIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Horton v. Garrett Freightlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Royce v. Southwest Pipe of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Mapusaga v. Red Lion Riverside InnIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burton v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Stanley v. Idaho Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Westman v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API