Legal Opinion
City of Fergus Falls v. Whitlock
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 18, 1956No. 36,643PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an action in ejectment brought by the city of Fergus Falls against the defendant, G-. Harry Whitlock, for the recovery of certain property in the area designated as Deserve 82 in the city of Fergus Falls. The trial court found for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals from a denial of his motion for amended findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment or in the alternative for a new trial.
The first of the two tracts of land in question was originally deeded to the city by the Wright Holding Company for a one-dollar consideration on December 1,1938, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Alexander Co. v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Gontrum v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Village of Newport v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Board of Park Commissioners v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Schaeffer v. NewberrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Chesapeake Marine Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Plymouth Foam Products, Inc. v. City of Becker, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Messersmith v. Mayor of RiverdaleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Leader v. JoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Rein v. Town of Spring LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.