Legal Opinion

Bank of Enoree v. Yarborough

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 5, 1922No. 10946Published

1Opinion

On Petition eor Rehearing

2Per curiam

The petition for rehearing questions the correctness of the opinion which has been filed upon the ground only that the answer put in issue the reasonableness of the allowance of attorney’s fees, which issue, it is claimed, could only have been determined by the verdict of a jury.

As this presents a much vexed question constantly occurring, we propose to settle the law upon the subject once for all.

In this particular case,-or rather cases, as there are four of them, the amounts due upon the several notes and the attorney’s fees allowed were as follows:

Bank of Enoree v.…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Yakima National Bank v. KnipeWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Coley v. ColeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  4. Futoransky v. PopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Farmers & Mechanics Bank v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API