Legal Opinion

State v. Beauregard

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2000PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · AndersonAnderson, C.J.

in which BIRCH, HOLDER, and BARKER, JJ., joined.

In this appeal, we consider whether the constitutional principle of either dou ble jeopardy or due process is violated and therefore bars separate convictions for both rape and incest when the offenses arise from a single act committed against the same victim. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the defendant’s convictions for rape and incest. After our review of the record and applicable authorities, we conclude that the separate convictions for rape and incest did not violate double jeopardy principles under the United States or…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Duchac v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Leyendecker & Associates, Inc. v. WechterTexas Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. WatkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. ConwayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  3. Cable v. ClemmonsTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Studdard v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Frederick Beauregard v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API