State v. Pugh
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
225 P.3d 892 (2009)
167 Wash.2d 825
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Timothy Earl PUGH, Petitioner.
No. 80850-3.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued February 12, 2009.
Decided December 31, 2009.
James Morrissey Whisman, King County Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
Maureen Marie Cyr, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
MADSEN, J.
¶ 1 The defendant contends that his state and federal rights to confrontation were violated when the trial court admitted a recording of a 911 call at his trial. He argues that the state's confrontation clause, article I,…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. RamosWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. LuiWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Lummi Indian Nation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Lummi Indian Nation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.