Legal Opinion

State v. Lui

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 2014No. 84045-8PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.

¶1 This case presents the question of when the confrontation clause requires testimony from lab analysts who conduct forensic tests on evidence. While the United States Supreme Court has grappled with this issue on multiple occasions, a majority of the Court has not adopted a single theory or test. Accordingly, our decision follows the results of recent Supreme Court decisions and proposes a test for expert witnesses that does not conflict with Supreme Court precedent.

¶2 We examine the plain language of the confrontation right: an accused person has a right to confront “the witnesses against…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. People v. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. W.R.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Durland v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. Katherine Lea StanfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In re the Marriage of ChandolaWashington Supreme Court · 2014

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API