Legal Opinion
Cascadia Wildlands v. United States Forest Service
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 21, 2013No. Case No. 6:12-cv-00804-AAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AIKEN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs Cascadia Wildlands and Oregon Wild move for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Defendant United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) and defendant-intervenors Freres Lumber Company, Inc. (“Freres”) and *1273Seneca Sawmill Company (“Seneca”)1 each filed cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the parties’ motions are granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
This case involves a challenge to the Forest Service’s authorization of the Goose Project (“Project”) located in the McKenzie Ranger District of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. Federal Aviation Administration William Withycombe, Regional Administrator, FaaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Native Ecosystems Council v. U.S. Forest Service, an agency of U.S. Dept. of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Biodiversity Conservation Alliance v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Wild v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Or. Natural Desert Ass'n v. CainDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. GranthamDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022