Legal Opinion

Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. Grantham

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 9, 2022No. 2:18-cv-02785Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER; ENVIRONMENTAL 12 PROTECTION INFORMATION No. 2:18-cv-02785-TLN-DMC CENTER; and KLAMATH FOREST 13 ALLIANCE, 14 ORDER Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 PATRICIA A. GRANTHAM, Klamath 17 National Forest Supervisor, and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, 18 Defendants, 19 and 20 AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE 21 COUNCIL, an Oregon non-profit corporation, 22 Intervenor Defendant. 23 24 25 This matter is before the Court on three motions for summary judgment: (1) Klamath- 26 Siskiyou Wildlands Center’s,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API