Legal Opinion

Schoemaker v. Meadows

New York County Court, Chautauqua County

Decided January 27, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOttaway, J.

Some years ago the owner of timber lands in question entered into a contract for the sale of certain standing timber “ with the right to enter on said premises and cut and remove! the same at any time within five years from the date hereof. ”i This contract was dated September 2, 1931.

Later, defendant became the owner of the premises in question subject only to the contract right to remove timber. Plaintiff became the rightful owner of the contract and prior to September 2, 1931, cut, split and piled on the premises a quantity of slab wood. When he sought to remove this wood after the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bunch v. Elizabeth City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Hodges v. BuellMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Griffin v. Anderson-Tully Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Smith v. RamseySupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
  5. Bank of California v. Clear Lake Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Kron Chocolatier, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. In Re Marcalus Mfg. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API