Barr v. Barr
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Cureton, Judge:
In this divorce case the appellant wife appeals from provisions of the family court decree pertaining to the equitable distribution of the marital home. We affirm.
The wife raised five exceptions to the family court order, but has abandoned all but one either by not arguing them in her brief or by failure to assign error in the exceptions. Nienow v. Nienow, 268 S. C. 161, 232 S. E. (2d) 504 (1977) (failure to argue issue in brief deemed abandonment of exception); Bentrim v. Bentrim, 282 S. C. 333, 318 S. E. (2d) 131 (Ct. App. 1984) (failure to raise issue in an exception…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of HerronMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Nienow v. NienowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Klutts Resort Realty, Inc. v. Down'Round Development Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Hussey v. HusseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Burgess v. BurgessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Trimnal v. TrimnalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Sauls v. SaulsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Berry v. BerryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Forest Dunes Associates v. Club Carib, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.