Legal Opinion

Berry v. Berry

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 20, 1986No. 0809PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

In this divorce action both parties appeal certain aspects of the equitable division award. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

The parties are in their early fifties and had been married for thirty years at the time they were divorced. Their two children are over eighteen years of age and are in college. The husband initiated this action for a divorce based upon the wife’s adultery and prayed for an equitable division of all marital property. The wife admitted adultery and counterclaimed for equitable division of marital property, alimony and attorney fees.

The trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reid v. ReidCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Walton v. WaltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Lake MeredithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  5. Bannen v. BannenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Watson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Leas v. LeasSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Berry v. BerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Coppola v. FarinaConnecticut Superior Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API