Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1992No. 17717PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for first-degree burglary in violation of SDCL 22-32-l(3). 1 Subsequently, Defendant Bruce Martin (Martin) pled guilty to being an habitual offender under SDCL 22-7-7. He appeals raising the following issues:

1. Whether the State failed to prosecute Martin within 180 days in violation of SDCL 23A-44-5.1.

2. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying Martin’s motion for a change of venue.

3. Whether the trial court erred in refusing to include an instruction on simple assault as a lesser-included offense of burglary.

4. Whether the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MyrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. State v. ReimanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. HeumillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. BaskerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. HuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HeftelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. OwensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hays v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. TalaricoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. BahmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API