Legal Opinion

State v. Bahm

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1992No. 17600PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ACTION

2Per curiam

Larry Bahm appeals his conviction for possession of marijuana. We reverse.

FACTS

The Clay County Sheriff’s office got a tip that Bahm was growing marijuana on his farm. They searched his farm and home and recovered several pounds of marijuana. Bahm was arrested for possession of marijuana. He made his first appearance before a magistrate on July 20, 1990. 1

Bahm’s defense attorney filed several pretrial motions, none of which involved any delay to the case. On October 26, 1990, Bahm filed a motion requesting an order directing the prosecution to divulge the names of the “unidentified…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Shilvock-HavirdSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. ManleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. State v. BeynonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. CrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. White MountainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Two Eagle v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hays v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. CottrillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Cooper v. HauschildSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hays v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API