Legal Opinion

State v. Heftel

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1994No. 18327PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

Philip Heftel (Heftel) appeals convictions for committing grand theft in violation of 22-30A-3(3) and being an habitual offender under SDCL 22-7-8. We affirm.

FACTS

Heftel moved to Deadwood, South Dakota, in July, 1992, and was employed at the Sil-verado Casino. Upon arriving in Deadwood, he opened a joint savings account (not a cheeking account) at the local branch of the Norwest Bank.1 Heftel claimed he had always been unable to keep a checkbook balanced so he relied on the bank to monitor the balance in the savings account.

On the afternoon of September 14, 1992, Heftel…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State v. DaviSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. KleinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. HolterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. Shilvock-HavirdSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. PerovichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. HenjumSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Miller v. JacobsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API