Legal Opinion

Schmieder v. Barney

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 2, 1885No. 109PublishedCited by 23 opinions

IN error to the circuit court of the united states for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The facts which make the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Justice ‘Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only fact in issue in this case on the trial below was whether the “ Saxony dress goods ” imported by the plaintiffs in error were “goods of similar description” to “delaines,” within the meaning of that terrn as used in the tariff act of July 14, 1862, ch. 163, § 9, 12 Stat. 553. To maintain this issue on their part, the plaintiffs in error called a number of merchants and commercial experts, by whom they offered to prove that, in trade, among merchants and importers, “ Saxony woven dress goods” were not, in 1861 and 1862, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Terry v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Swan v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. American Net & Twine Co. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API