Legal Opinion
In re Love Canal Actions
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 11, 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: We modify paragraph (1) (b) of the first ordering clause of the discovery order of the supervising Justice to read as follows: "(b) reports of treating physicians and the identity of each person whom the plaintiff expects to call as an expert witness (including medical experts) at trial, together with a statement disclosing in reasonable detail the subject matter on which each expert is expected to testify, the substance of the facts *1170and opinions on which each expert is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Love Canal ActionsNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Sarbro Realty Corp. v. KradjianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Seneca Knitting Mills Corp. v. WilkesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barrowman v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Ecumenical Task Force of Niagara Frontier, Inc. v. Love Canal Area Revitalization AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Blumenthal v. Tops Friendly MarketsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Blaine v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Petersen v. OwensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.