Legal Opinion
In re Love Canal Actions
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Vincent E. Doyle, J.
Motion by Occidental Chemical Corporation (Occidental defendant), Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Niagara Falls, New York, the City of Niagara Falls, New York, and the County of Niagara, New York, for an order amending the four coordinated discovery orders previously granted in these Love Canal actions (entered Aug. 7, 1981, Feb. 4, 1983, Sept. 25, 1984 and Sept. 25, 1984) by granting a superseding coordinate discovery order:
1) so that, prior to allowing a plaintiff to further prosecute a personal injury claim after service…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- In re Association of the BarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Bankers Trust Co. v. BratenNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Adinolfe v. LandfillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Antero Resources Corp. v. StrudleySupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
- Ecumenical Task Force of Niagara Frontier, Inc. v. Love Canal Area Revitalization AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re Love Canal ActionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Petersen v. OwensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Steiner v. BonhamerNew York Supreme Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.